Warning: Obama Ed aims at U.S.takeover
All schools – even parents at home –
may be forced to teach gov't agenda
Posted: November 02, 20118:46 pm Eastern - By Bob Unruh
An organization that monitors the U.S. government's influence on education, and specifically on parents who choose to school their own children, is warning of a pending move in Washington that would result in "de facto national education standards."
The measure could not only require parents who home school their children to teach certain government agenda issues but also effectively remove much of the decision-making authority of local school boards and districts, warns the Home School Legal Defense Association.
The organization focuses on issues affecting home school students and their parents in the United States and overseas, but also keeps an eye on the larger picture of education policy.
The concern is about Democrat-driven plans in the U.S. Senate to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, a massive federal program last reauthorized in 2001 as the No Child Left Behind Act.
"HSLDA's federal relations staff have read this 868-page bill, and we believe that while it does not directly impact home school freedom, the bill will 1) increase the federal role in education at the expense of state, local and parental control, and 2) will greatly increase the pressure on states to align their curriculum and standards, resulting in de facto national education standards," said the report compiled by Melanie P. Palazzo, the organization's congressional action program director, and William A. Estrada of the organization's federal relations office.
HSLDA said the Senate Education Commission already has voted to approve the plan, but at the request of Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., there will be a hearing Nov. 8. The home schooling group is urging its constituents to contact committee members and express concern.
The group fears the bill "will greatly increase the federal government's control over education."
HSLDA said that as an organization it remained neutral on the 2001 NCLB update, "because it included strongly written protections for home schoolers, and prohibitions on federal funding for national teacher certification, national standards, national testing, and national databases."
"A decade later, nearly all education policy makers agree that NCLB is too inflexible. HSLDA believes this illustrates that the federal government should not be in the business of establishing education policy for the nation's schoolchildren," the report said.
Now the reauthorization plan raises concerns over "the failed 'Washington-knows-best, one-size-fits-all' approach."
One provision of the bill specifically mandates that any state taking federal funds "must put in place 'college and career ready aligned standards.'"
"Mandating that each state have aligned standards with aligned coursework will guarantee the creation of national academic standards, national curriculum, and national testing," this week's report on the controversy said.
"We believe this will result in the eventual requirement that home schoolers use these national standards, curriculum, and testing," the report said.
While some specifics that could be included in a final bill remain unclear, "the trend of national standards could lead to home schoolers losing the freedom to choose the curriculum for their children."
An earlier HSLDA report by Estrada pointed out that national standards would remove control from local boards and districts and allow "unelected bureaucrats, not parents" to decide what subjects should be taught.
"National standards are a first step to a national curriculum and national testing," Estrada wrote. "Certain federal education funds to the states would be contingent on the states adopting the standards, which would place incredible pressure on the states to accept these national standards. And if some states resisted efforts to adopt the standards, this could easily lead to calls to make the standards mandatory in the name of being fair to all students. Furthermore, unelected bureaucrats would be able to choose what they believe every school child should be taught."
Just last year, Estrada said that such was the situation with the Washington "Race to the Top" funding for schools.
"If the federal government funds something, the federal government is going to control it. What we have is a de facto set of nationalized education standards being created."
(Comment: In June 2010, Obama passed and Executive Order requiring every state to license all private colleges in their jurisdiction. There has been a battle going on behind the scenes between several private sector educational groups and the Department of Education. No compromise or agreement are on the horizon. Eventually, the Department of Education will push the issue and law-suits will be filed and eventually pushed up to the Supreme Court. The objective of the leftists in Congress and the Administration is to completely take control over all educational institutions/private companies in the country)_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers
Study Group
When:Every Tuesday of the month
Time: 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM
Where: Port Charlotte International Church
24038 Harborview Rd.
Port Charlotte, FL
Anyone with questions may call Janet Bell at 258-0248. Folks may join at any time; one does not need to worry about what they missed. Each discussion stands on its own.
Group Discussion Leaders: Peter and Janet Bell
http://www.dailypaul.com/Dedicated to restoring Constitutional government to the United States
www.thelibertyvoice.com The Liberty Voice
www.mises.org Great Austrian economics sight
www.win.revolutionbroadcasting.com/Default.aspx Restore the Republic Radio station
98.129.5.212/BreakTheMatrix/BTM/Modules/boombox1.aspx?ChannelID=411Break the Matrix (Take back the media)
www.nccs.netNational Center for Constitutional studies
www.nccs.net/constitution/quiz.php Constitutional quizes
www.constitutionpreservation.org/articles Articles by Michael Bradnarik (Constitutional activist)
www.archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik Excellent Constitution class taught by Michael Bradnarik
chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/ Sermons by Chuck Baldwin (2008 Constitution party candidate for president - Constitutional activist)
www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwina.htm Articles by Chuck Baldwin
www.wallbuilders.com/ David Bartons site
www.voterfocus.com/ws/WScandnew/candidate_pr.php?c=charlotte Local announced candidates for 2010
election.dos.state.fl.us/candidate/index.asp Florida State and National candidates
www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php The Constitution Party Platform
givemeliberty.org/revolution/ We the people (Continuing The Revolution: Peacefully Restoring Constitutional Order)
www.congress.org/congressorg/megavote/ (Track your Senators' and Representatives' votes by email - I believe this shows every vote)
writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml Easy way to get email info on your representative.
charlotte.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=15 Watch local Commissioner meetings - archived
www.thirdpartyticket.com/ (A great attempt to let the American People see an honest debate between all parties)
www.constitutionparty.com/ The Constitution Party
www.lp.org/ The Libertarian Party
www.gop.com/ The Republican Party
www.democrats.org/ The Democratic Party
www.gp.org/index.php The Green Party
www.usiap.org/ The Independent American Party
www.prohibition.org/ The Prohibitionist Party
www.objectivistparty.us/ The Objectionist Party
www.sp-usa.org/ The Socialist Party
www.cpusa.org/ The Communist Party
votesmart.org/search.php?search=33950&submit_lastname-zip.x=0&submit_lastname-zip.y=0#elections
Here is a site you will need in the future. It tells how our representatives vote on issues and even gives their rankings with special interest groups. Shows their conservative rankings and even has their campaign finances. This is a very good tool. This link is for 33950 zip code. Copy and paste it in your browser.
